Uncategorized

ST.Washington is in turmoil after Senator Marco Rubio introduced his explosive Born in America Act, a measure that immediately disqualified 14 lawmakers accused of holding dual citizenship and harboring “divided allegiance.” The announcement sent shockwaves through the Capitol, igniting fierce debate and outrage.

PART I — THE SHOCK THAT SPLIT THE CAPITOL

Washington has weathered scandals, shutdowns, and power struggles — but nothing in recent memory compares to the political earthquake that hit the Capitol this week.

It began with a single sentence.

Senator Everett Cole, a polished, sharp-edged conservative from Arizona known for his disciplined rhetoric and surgical timing, stepped up to the podium and introduced a bill no one saw coming:

The Born Sovereign Act.

In 47 pages of tightly drafted legislative language, it would immediately disqualify any sitting member of Congress who holds dual citizenship — or is accused of hiding it. The bill declared that “divided allegiance is incompatible with federal office.”

But it was Senator Cole’s words, delivered in a tone like iron scraping marble, that sent actual shockwaves through the chamber:

**“This is LOYALTY.

If you cheated your way into office — it’s OVER.”**

There was a beat of stunned silence.

Then chaos.

Lawmakers shouted. Journalists scrambled. Advisors whispered frantically into cell phones. It felt like a crack had opened beneath the Senate.

But even that wasn’t the bombshell.

Because attached to Cole’s bill was a sealed appendix — one that Capitol insiders had been warning leadership about for weeks.

Inside it:

**A list of 14 sitting lawmakers allegedly holding undisclosed dual citizenship.

They were immediately barred from chamber votes pending verification.**

Though their names have not yet been released to the public, the leaks started within hours.

And panic spread like wildfire.


A CAPITOL IN FREEFALL

Within minutes of Cole’s announcement, the Senate erupted into shouting. Lawmakers surged toward the dais. The Sergeant-at-Arms stepped between senators who looked moments away from throwing punches.

Senator Lila Dresden of Oregon screamed across the aisle:

“This is a coup disguised as legislation!”

Senator Hale Burroughs of Indiana fired back:

“Maybe if you didn’t have two passports, you wouldn’t be sweating!”

Security had to step between them.

The Clerk’s voice shook as she attempted to restore order.

And in the chaos — Cole stood still, hands clasped behind his back, cold as a statue.

But the situation spiraled even further when, ten minutes later, Senator Miriam Stroud, a deceptively soft-spoken Louisiana firebrand with a steel spine, took her turn at the podium.

She introduced a second bill.

A bill that made the first look tame.

The Loyalty Audit.

If passed, it would order a full federal investigation into every member of Congress — including:

  • foreign assets
  • international donations
  • “shadow organizations”
  • offshore holdings
  • foreign contacts
  • spouses’ business ties
  • “political influence pipelines”
  • foreign travel connected to lobbying groups

And the line that made Washington go ice-cold:

**“If you serve two flags,

you cannot serve mine.”**

Stroud let the words sink in before delivering the dagger:

**“More names are coming.

A lot more.”**

The chamber fell into a horrified hush.

Senators exchanged terrified glances. Phones vibrated nonstop. One staffer vomited in the cloakroom.

Washington insiders later described it as:

“The moment the entire building realized no one was safe.”


PART II — WHO ARE THE 14?

The identities of the disqualified lawmakers remain officially sealed — but in Washington, nothing stays secret for long.

Within hours, political reporters pieced together what insiders were whispering:

The list supposedly includes:

  • 3 senior senators
  • 9 House members
  • 2 committee chairs

Rumors swirled with terrifying speed:

Were leadership members on the list?

Were national security committees compromised?

Was this just the beginning?

By nightfall, reporters camped outside the offices of suspected lawmakers. Staffers rushed out of side doors, pale and shaken. Two chiefs of staff resigned before midnight.

And in the halls of Congress, one phrase kept repeating:

“Who’s next?”

Because Senator Stroud’s “more names are coming” wasn’t a threat.

It was a promise.


THE PRESIDENT WEIGHS IN — AND MAKES IT WORSE

The fictional President, Thomas Keating, attempted to calm the storm the next morning.

It didn’t work.

Keating, flanked by advisors who looked like they hadn’t slept in days, called the situation “a legislative overreach” and urged “patience and careful review.”

But reporters immediately fired back:

  • “Do you support full investigations?”
  • “Do any members of your Cabinet hold dual citizenship?”
  • “Will you veto the Loyalty Audit?”

Keating stumbled, answering none of them clearly.

The markets dipped.
Cable news went nuclear.
International allies demanded clarification.

And behind closed doors, a member of the President’s own party was overheard saying:

“He lost control of this the second Cole opened his mouth.”


THE CLASH BEHIND THE CURTAIN — COLE VS. STROUD

Though Senators Everett Cole and Miriam Stroud appear aligned, insiders say the alliance is brittle.

Cole is a constitutional purist — cold, calculating, methodical.

Stroud is a populist crusader — emotional, sharp-tongued, fearless.

Their teams barely speak.

Some aides claim Stroud blindsided Cole with the Loyalty Audit.

Others say Cole’s list of 14 was “only Act I,” and Stroud is preparing Act II.

One senior staffer, speaking anonymously, told us:

“Cole wants the truth.
Stroud wants revenge.
And the two together?
It’s like mixing gasoline with a match.”

If true, Washington may be heading for an internal war unlike anything in modern history.


PART III — THE COUNTRY ERUPTS

By the end of the week, protests exploded across the nation.

In Phoenix:
Marchers chanted “ONE FLAG. ONE LOYALTY.” Cole’s name appeared on homemade signs decorated with eagles and flames.

In Portland:
Counter-protesters waved banners reading “McCarthyism 2.0,” “This Is A Power Grab,” and “We Don’t Purge Democracy.”

In New York City:
Thousands shut down traffic demanding transparency: “Release the 14!”

In Louisiana:
Stroud’s supporters flooded Baton Rouge, cheering her “courage to clean house.”

Cable news ran wall-to-wall coverage.

Pundits screamed.
Professors lectured.
Retired generals warned.
Historians wrote frantic op-eds.

Some called it patriotism renewed.
Others called it the beginning of legislative extremism.
Some whisper it’s the first step toward a constitutional crisis.


INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES PANIC

While Congress screamed publicly, intelligence agencies panicked privately.

According to leaks:

  • The FBI activated a “rapid review task force”
  • DHS flagged dozens of “high-risk influence channels”
  • CIA briefed senators behind locked doors
  • NSA analysts frantically traced foreign money flows

One intelligence official warned:

“This audit could expose things this town was never meant to see.”

Another said:

“If Congress opens these files, they won’t be able to close them again.”

The implication:
Congress might uncover things that destabilize global alliances, embarrass the State Department, or reveal years of quiet political infiltration.


THE SUPREME COURT FACTOR

During his fiery speech, Senator Cole yelled:

“The Supreme Court will uphold this. Count on it.”

He wasn’t bluffing.

Cole has quietly courted several constitutional scholars, building a case based on:

  • Article I privileges
  • National security precedent
  • Sovereignty doctrine
  • Limits on foreign influence

Legal experts remain split.

Some say it could stand.
Others say it’s blatantly unconstitutional.
A few warn it could set a terrifying precedent:

“Today it’s citizenship.
Tomorrow it’s ideology.”

The Supreme Court has not commented, but sources say two justices have already requested early briefs.

This is no longer a legislative fight.

It’s a constitutional collision.


PART IV — WHO WILL FALL NEXT?

By now, one thing is clear:

The 14 lawmakers already sidelined are only the beginning.

Stroud has hinted she has a second list — “larger and more alarming.”

Cole’s office denies coordinating with her.

Stroud’s office denies receiving leaks from federal agencies.

Both are probably lying.

Washington insiders claim the next wave could include:

  • A committee vice-chair
  • A long-serving senator from the Midwest
  • A rising star from a coastal blue state
  • A House Intelligence Subcommittee member

No one knows for sure.

But fear is growing.

Because if Stroud’s next list is longer —
or if Cole expands the Act —
or if intelligence agencies confirm a single foreign financial pipeline —

Washington could fracture permanently.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button